By Haseeb
Website: Nfllivescores.com
TikTok: Nfllivescores
Facebook: NFL LIVE SCORES
Trump’s talks with Putin
Zelensky Warns Against Sidestepping Ukraine in Global Diplomacy
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has firmly stated that any discussions between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will be “futile” without the direct involvement of Ukraine. Speaking during a recent press briefing in Kyiv, Zelensky emphasized that ignoring Ukraine’s voice in negotiations risks legitimizing Russia’s ongoing aggression and undermining international law.
Historical Context of Trump-Putin Relations
Trump’s relationship with Putin has long been a focal point of international political debate. From their 2018 Helsinki summit to numerous behind-the-scenes communications, Trump has often spoken about his ability to strike a deal with the Kremlin. However, Zelensky argues that such talks, if excluding Ukraine, would not result in any sustainable peace.
Ukraine’s position is rooted in its ongoing war with Russia, which began in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea and escalated into a full-scale invasion in February 2022. Since then, tens of thousands have been killed, and millions displaced, with no comprehensive peace agreement in sight.
Kyiv’s Perspective on International Negotiations
From Ukraine’s perspective, every diplomatic endeavor must continue to center on the preservation of its sovereignty. Zelensky made it clear:
“Without Ukraine at the table, there is no deal — only a pause before the next war.”
This message was aimed not only at Trump but also at world leaders considering bypassing Kyiv to strike a bargain directly with Moscow. Ukrainian officials believe that such an approach risks emboldening Russia and could create a dangerous precedent for other conflicts around the world.
The U.S. Political Landscape and Ukraine Policy
Trump, who is once again campaigning for the U.S. president, has asserted that if elected, he could “end the war in 24 hours.” While he has not shared specific details of his plan, critics fear that his approach could involve pressuring Ukraine into territorial concessions.
President Joe Biden’s administration has taken the opposite stance — supporting Kyiv with military aid, financial assistance, and diplomatic backing in global forums such as the United Nations. The contrast in strategies between Biden and Trump underscores a growing divide in U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine and Russia.
Russia’s Stance and Strategic Goals
For Putin, any talks with Trump present an opportunity to weaken Western unity on sanctions and military support for Ukraine. Analysts believe that Russia seeks a freeze in hostilities that would allow it to consolidate control over occupied territories while avoiding further battlefield losses.
However, Ukraine remains adamant that peace without full territorial restoration — including Crimea — is unacceptable.
Impact on NATO and European Security
The consequences of keeping Ukraine out of the talks run well beyond its boundaries. NATO officials have warned that if Russia is allowed to retain control over Ukrainian land, it could embolden Moscow to test NATO’s resolve in Eastern Europe. Countries like Poland, Lithuania, and Estonia have repeatedly stressed that the war is not just about Ukraine’s freedom but about the security architecture of the entire continent.
Zelensky’s Call to the International Community
Zelensky has urged Western allies, especially the European Union and United States, to maintain unity in their stance against Russia. He has also called for the implementation of the Ukrainian Peace Formula, a 10-point plan that includes complete withdrawal of Russian troops, restoration of Ukraine’s territorial integrity, and justice for war crimes.
This plan has been endorsed by dozens of nations but remains rejected by Moscow, which insists on recognizing the territories it currently occupies.
Potential Scenarios if Ukraine Is Excluded from Talks
Experts outline several dangerous scenarios if Ukraine is not included:
Legitimization of Russian Occupation – Without Ukraine’s voice, Russia’s territorial gains could be cemented.
Erosion of International Law – Such a move would undermine the principle that borders cannot be changed by force.
Weakened Global Alliances – It could fracture NATO unity and embolden authoritarian states.
Resurgence of Violence – A “peace” deal without Ukraine’s consent would likely collapse, leading to renewed conflict.
Trump’s Political Calculus
While Trump’s foreign policy approach remains unpredictable, his history suggests a transactional strategy, potentially prioritizing U.S.-Russia relations over Ukraine’s demands. This raises concerns among Kyiv’s leadership that Trump’s return to the White House could drastically shift U.S. policy — from military support to a diplomatic shortcut that favors Moscow’s terms.
Why Ukraine’s Participation Is Non-Negotiable
At its core, Ukraine’s argument is rooted in the principle of self-determination. Negotiating the fate of a sovereign nation without its consent violates both moral and legal norms. As Zelensky put it:
“We will be the subject of negotiations, not the object of them.”
Final Thoughts
With the U.S. elections approaching and the war entering its third year, the future of Ukraine’s sovereignty may depend heavily on the outcome of political decisions made far beyond Kyiv. For Ukraine, staying at the table is not just a diplomatic demand — it’s a matter of national survival.
About the Author
